JasonWyatt

CSS Selector Specificity Ambiguity

I was talking with someone last week regarding CSS selector specificity calculations and rules regarding the cascade order. We ended up running into an ambiguity with what the W3C’s CSS spec calls a large base for the specificity ‘number’ concatenation.

I’ve copied and pasted the section from the spec here:

6.4.3 Calculating a selector’s specificity

A selector’s specificity is calculated as follows:

• count 1 if the declaration is from is a ‘style’ attribute rather than a rule with a selector, 0 otherwise (= a) (In HTML, values of an element’s “style” attribute are style sheet rules. These rules have no selectors, so a=1, b=0, c=0, and d=0.)
• count the number of ID attributes in the selector (= b)
• count the number of other attributes and pseudo-classes in the selector (= c)
• count the number of element names and pseudo-elements in the selector (= d)

The specificity is based only on the form of the selector. In particular, a selector of the form [id=p33] is counted as an attribute selector (a=0, b=0, c=1, d=0), even if the id attribute is defined as an ID in the source document’s DTD.

Concatenating the four numbers a-b-c-d (in a number system with a large base) gives the specificity.

Some examples:

 *             {}  /* a=0 b=0 c=0 d=0 -> specificity = 0,0,0,0 */
 li            {}  /* a=0 b=0 c=0 d=1 -> specificity = 0,0,0,1 */
 li:first-line {}  /* a=0 b=0 c=0 d=2 -> specificity = 0,0,0,2 */
 ul li         {}  /* a=0 b=0 c=0 d=2 -> specificity = 0,0,0,2 */
 ul ol+li      {}  /* a=0 b=0 c=0 d=3 -> specificity = 0,0,0,3 */
 h1 + *[rel=up]{}  /* a=0 b=0 c=1 d=1 -> specificity = 0,0,1,1 */
 ul ol li.red  {}  /* a=0 b=0 c=1 d=3 -> specificity = 0,0,1,3 */
 li.red.level  {}  /* a=0 b=0 c=2 d=1 -> specificity = 0,0,2,1 */
 #x34y         {}  /* a=0 b=1 c=0 d=0 -> specificity = 0,1,0,0 */
 style=""          /* a=1 b=0 c=0 d=0 -> specificity = 1,0,0,0 */

My Question

I found this site and this site, both of which attempt to verify that your browser obeys the stipulation of a “large base”, but they don’t try to figure out what that base actually is.

I wonder what this “large base” is defined as in the various browsers. Hit me up on twitter @jasonwyatt or reply on Tumblr.